Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Pragmatik

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 13, 2021
https://doi.org/10.31002/kabastra.v1i1.7
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal KABASTRA: Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rizki Dian Safitri
Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia S2 Universitas Tidar
Mimi Mulyani
Universitas Tidar
Farikah
Universitas Tidar

Abstract

This article explains the theory of speech acts proposed by John L. Austin and his student John R. Searle. Speech act theory is a sub-field of pragmatics. This field of study deals with the ways in which words can be used not only to present information but also to carry out actions. This theory considers three levels or components of speech: locutionary acts (the making of a meaningful statement, saying something that a hearer understands), illocutionary acts (saying something with a purpose, such as to inform), and perlocutionary acts (saying something that causes someone to act). Many view speech acts as the central units of communication, with phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of an utterance serving as ways of identifying the meaning of a speaker’s utterance or illocutionary force. There are five types of Illocutionary points according to Searle: declarations, assertives, expressives, directives, and commissives (1979:viii). A speech act, in order to be successful, needs to be performed along with certain types of conditions. These conditions were categorized by the linguist John Searle, who introduced the term felicity conditions: propositional content condition, preparatory condition, sincerity condition, and essential condition.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Safitri, R. D., Mulyani, M., & Farikah. (2021). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Pragmatik. KABASTRA: Kajian Bahasa Dan Sastra, 1(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.31002/kabastra.v1i1.7

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How do to Things with Words. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
  2. Habermas, J. (1998). On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  3. Sadock, J. M. (1974). Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York:
  4. Academic Press.
  5. Saifudin, A. (2005). Faktor Sosial Budaya dan Kesopanan Orang Jepang dalam Pengungkapan Tindak Tutur Terima Kasih pada Skenario Drama Televisi Beautiful Life Karya Kitagawa Eriko. Universitas Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13134.56643
  6. Saifudin, A. (2010). Analisis Pragmatik Variasi Kesantunan Tindak Tutur Terima Kasih Bahasa Jepang dalam Film Beautiful Life Karya Kitagawa Eriko. LITE, 6(2), 172–181.
  7. Saifudin, A. (2018). Konteks dalam studi linguistik pragmatik. LITE, 1(1), 108–117.
  8. Saifudin, A., Aryanto, B., & Budi, I. S. (2008). Analisis Fungsi Pragmatik Tindak Tutur Pertanyaan dalam Percakapan Bahasa Jepang antara Wisatawan Jepang dan Pemandu Wisata Indonesia di Candi Borobudur. LITE, 4(1), 8–15.
  9. Searle, J. R. (1971). The Philosophy of Language (Oxford Readings in Philosophy).
  10. London: Oxford University Press.
  11. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Essay Collection (Vol. 49). https://doi.org/10.2307/2184